Skip to content

Southern Germany

Laravel development for companies in Munich

We work from Stuttgart for clients in Munich, usually as extra development capacity alongside a team with no hands free.

Munich is the largest software location in the country, and that has a flip side. The same developers are courted here by corporations, by established mid-sized firms and by a few hundred well-funded startups. IT salaries are the highest in Germany. Advertise a position and you wait.

On top of that comes a mix of industries you will not find twice. Munich is an insurance and reinsurance centre, a media city and an automotive region all at once. Three worlds with very different ideas about how a software project runs.

Capacity, not competence

Enquiries from Munich rarely come from firms that would not know how to build software. They come from teams that know exactly what needs doing and are booked out until the autumn. A release is coming, a module is supposed to appear alongside it, and both at once does not work.

We then take on a bounded part rather than plugging in everywhere. What bounded means is settled beforehand: a module, a service, an interface, with a seam along which a clean handover is possible later. Our approach is described under Laravel development.

When the application is only part of the whole

In larger organisations, hardly anything stands on its own. There is an identity management system to dock onto, a data warehouse wanting to be fed, and three systems writing the same customer number differently. The effort then sits less in the application than in the transitions. How we build those is under API and backend development.

Regulated environments change the scope

In the insurance world, requirements apply that play no part elsewhere. Evidence of who changed what and when. Approvals that have to be documented. Reviews in which somebody from outside wants to see how a figure came about.

That is manageable and costs decisions that belong at the start. What gets logged, how long it is kept, who may read it. Retrofitting something like that is expensive, because the very period you would have needed it for is missing.

One boundary matters to us here: we build what your department or your auditor requires, and we say in advance which parts get technically expensive. Whether an implementation satisfies a regulation is not a developer’s question.

About the distance

Stuttgart to Munich is a good two hours. Too far for a short review meeting, worth it for a kick-off workshop or a handover. In between we work remotely, with fixed dates rather than spontaneous calls. That is not a fallback but the more reliable form for ongoing work anyway.

Anyone who nonetheless wants regular presence should say so early. It can be done, but it changes the arithmetic, and we then put it in the quotation rather than on the invoice afterwards.

Süddeutschland

Weitere Städte in Süddeutschland

All locations

FAQ

Questions from Munich

Do you have an office in Munich?
No, and we will not rent one just to be able to print an address. Our base is Stuttgart. For the kick-off and for handovers we come to you; the rest runs remotely.
We have group-wide rules for external suppliers. Is that a problem?
As a rule no, it only costs lead time. Repository on your side, access over VPN, approved libraries, a security check before the first commit: we know all of that. What matters is that we hear about it before we estimate rather than afterwards.
Are you cheaper than an agency in Munich?
Often yes, and we think that is the weakest reason to engage us. An hourly rate says little about the price of a project. What is more interesting is how many rounds it takes to reach something usable, and that depends on the preparation, not the postcode.
How do you work with our internal team?
By its rules. We take on a bounded part, work in your repository and send our changes down the same route as your own. We would rather have a review by your people than none.
What happens when capacity frees up internally again?
Then we hand over. That is exactly what the scope is laid out for: a seam you can separate along, tests at the places that matter, and documentation explaining why something was solved that way. We do not want a working relationship that only holds because leaving would be too expensive.

A project in Munich?

Tell us what is being left undone because nobody internally comes free. That usually turns into a clear scope quickly.